Back to home

Use Case

Test Cases

Thorough testing is essential to a clean go-live, and two of the hardest parts are surfacing all the edge cases and documenting them efficiently.

The Problem

Testing can be one of the most difficult phases to execute well. With limited time and a long list of scenarios to cover, teams tend to focus on expected paths and miss the edge cases, the scenarios that only surface once changes hit production and real users encounter them first.

Edge cases are particularly hard to anticipate in Salesforce because complexity compounds them. A field change, a new validation rule, or an updated flow can interact with existing configuration in ways that aren't obvious upfront. The scenarios most likely to cause issues in production are often the ones least likely to appear in a manual test plan.

Documenting test cases is also time-consuming. Writing clear, executable test scripts from requirements takes significant effort that competes directly with the build, especially on projects running close to deadline. Because it's so time-consuming, it often gets skipped, which creates traceability problems if something breaks later.

The real cost of inadequate testing:

Failed go-lives: Production issues discovered by users, not QA.
Emergency support: Senior developers pulled off new work to fix issues that testing should have caught.
Lost trust: A rough go-live damages confidence in the system (and the team behind it) far longer than the issue itself.
Eroded margin: Post-go-live bug fixes pull time away from billable work and eat into project profitability.

How Swantide Addresses It

By prompting Swantide with what you're testing, you can quickly document the obvious scenarios and use it as a thought partner to surface the edge cases your team would likely miss, getting to production faster and with fewer errors.

01

Document obvious test cases in minutes

Give Swantide a requirement, user story, or feature description and immediately get well-structured test scripts for the expected scenarios. Coverage that would take hours to write manually takes minutes.

02

Surface edge cases you'd otherwise miss

Swantide acts as a thought partner for the harder part of testing: the edge cases. Ask what could go wrong, what boundary conditions exist, or how this feature interacts with the org's existing configuration. Get org-aware answers that surface scenarios a QA resource would typically overlook.

03

Validate test coverage against the org

Swantide checks your test scenarios against the actual org configuration (field constraints, validation rules, automation logic) to flag cases where existing behavior would affect expected outcomes.

04

Get to production faster, with fewer errors

Teams using Swantide for test case generation ship more confidently. Comprehensive coverage means production issues are caught in QA rather than discovered by users, and the time saved writing test cases goes back to the build and delivery.

Key Outcomes

Faster test case generation

Three days of manual test writing becomes a few hours, without sacrificing coverage.

Higher coverage including edge cases

AI-generated test cases surface the scenarios human QA writers most commonly overlook.

Consistent quality across every project

Every engagement gets the same standard of test coverage, regardless of who's on QA.

Powered By

AI Assistant

Generate test scenarios from requirements and design documentation. Ask questions about specific functionality to ensure test coverage maps accurately to what was built.

AI Admin

For teams using AI Admin for the build, test cases can be generated directly from the Technical Design Documents that drive configuration, ensuring tests align with what was actually built.

Who This Is For

QA Engineers

Generate comprehensive test scripts in a fraction of the time. Focus your manual effort on execution, not writing.

Business Analysts

Validate that what was built matches what was required, with test cases generated from your own requirements docs.

Project Managers on Fixed-Price Deals

Stop choosing between schedule and test coverage. Get both, without adding time to the testing phase.